Prospective authors are invited to submit original, high quality papers which is original and has not been submitted and published elsewhere.

Manuscripts should be at least 4 full pages and at most 10 pages.

The reviewing process of the ICLIE conference aims to provide authors with constructive feedback on their papers, even when a submission is rejected. All submissions will be subjected to double-blind peer reviews, who are expert or have been experiencing in the related field for years. The accepted papers must be revised, taking into consideration the referees' comments and suggestions, before inclusion in the conference proceedings.


All submitted papers will be reviewed by our committees, and accepted one will be published in conference proceedings. Authors can also choose to publish their paper on a selected Journal with an additional fee. Papers with outstanding quality will be recommended to a SCOPUS indexed journal for publication (the authors will pay the journal's Article Processing Charge if there is any). Below are the publication options for accepted papers:

 OptionISSNAditional Charge
Publication OptionICLIE 2021 Proceeding2734-956X0
Quantitative Economics and Management Studies2772-6247 USD 50
JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization2746-1440 USD 50
Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation2775-6165USD 50

SAINSMAT: Journal of Applied Sciences, Mathematics, and Its Education

2775-5371USD 50

Exceptional papers will be recommended for publication on the Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity (SCOPUS Q1)

2199-8531The authors will pay the journal's Article Processing Charge 
Exceptional papers will be recommended for publication on the Processes journal (SCOPUS Q2, SCIE)2227-9717The authors will pay the journal's Article Processing Charge 


Plagiarism is totally unacceptable to ICLIE. Submitted papers are expected to contain original work executed by the authors with adequate, proper and scholarly citations to the work of others. The authors have to clearly identify both their own contribution(s) and also published results / techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to ensure these standards are met.

If the author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:
1. Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.
2. Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s)
3. Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.
4. Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist”.